Recepción del artículo 21 de octubre, 2003 |
Primera edición 4 de febrero, 2004 |
Segunda edición, ampliada y corregida 7 de junio, 2021 |
Abstract
Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (SCC) is a very rare disease and a primary pleural manifestation is extremely rare. This paper reviews the available literature which consists of case reports including our own case of SCC of the pleura in a patient with pre-existent asbestos-related pleural plaques (1). Differential diagnosis of pleural masses that need to be differentiated from pleural SCC is discussed and the relation of pleural SCC with asbestos exposure is discussed.
Key words
Pleural disease, small cell carcinoma, chemotherapy, asbestos.
PLEURAL SMALL CELL CARCINOMA: AN UPDATE
IntroductionAn extensive literature search (PubMed and current contents) revealed four case presentations of a primary presentation of pleural SCC (1-4). Extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas (SCC) are uncommon (5;6), and primary localization of a SCC in the pleura is very rare. Levenson et.al. (5) described 8 patients (4%) with exclusive extrapulmonary localization of SCC in a series of 203 patients with pulmonary SCC (5). The primary site of SCC in these cases and the literature survey (n=70) reported in this paper showed that the most frequently reported site of extrapulmonary SCC was the esophagus (22%), salivary glands (20%), larynx (17%) skin and cervix (both 13%) and stomach (6%) (5). Skin SCC is also described as Merkel cell tumor (7). Pazdur and colleagues described 6 cases of primary extrapulmonary localization, none of them with a primary pleural localization (6).In the four reported cases of pleural SCC two had a history of asbestos exposure (1;2). Our patient was the only case of primary pleural SCC and pre-existent asbestos-related pleural plaques (1). In the case of pleural SCC presented by Bouvier and Bell asbestos exposure was reported but asbestos-related pleural disease or pulmonary disease on chest X-ray or CT-scan was not described (2). A third case of pleural SCC was found in a patient with prior ipsilateral tuberculosis, lobectomy for bronchiectasis and post-surgery empyema (4). In the last reported case of pleural SCC no previous pleural abnormalities were reported (3). All reported patients were heavy smokers with a tobacco exposure range of 30 to70 pack years. A summary of the case reports of patients with pleural SCC we have found in our literature search is given in Table 1.Table 1.Diagnosis and differential diagnosisTo adequately diagnose this rare disease it is of great importance to supply the pathologist with a sufficient amount of tissue to allow the required immunohistochemical investigations. The differential diagnosis of pleural masses includes malignant mesothelioma, benign fibrous mesothelioma, pleural localization of malignant lymphoma and metastatic pleural disease. The most important differential diagnosis of pleural mass without parenchymal lung abnormalities (especially in a patients with known asbestos exposure or evidence of asbestos exposure) is malignant mesothelioma. This differentiation can be difficult since it is known that some features of SCC may be observed in typical malignant mesothelioma (8;9). Also a similar pattern of deletions on chromosome 4 have been reported in both malignant mesothelioma and small cell lung carcinoma suggesting a similar pathogenesis (10). Another rare malignant tumor that is part of the differential diagnosis for pleural SCC is a pleural localization of a desmoplastic small round cell tumor (11;12). Desmoplastic small round cell tumors are characterized by nests of small tumor cells surrounded by a cellular and vascular collagenous stroma, hence the name desmoplastic small round cell tumor. The amount of stroma varies with the progression of the tumor, although the stroma is always seen. WT1, a polyclonal antibody against the amino terminus of the WT1 protein, has shown positive staining in more than 95% of cases and can be used to differentiate this tumor from SCC (11;12). In our patient (1) no evidence was found of typical histological features of mesothelioma or desmoplastic small round cell tumor. The immunohistochemical evaluation showed clear positive staining for keratin and neurorendocrine markers (Cam 5.2, keratin and chromogranine, synaptophysine, CD56, respectively) and negative staining for lymphocyte marker LCA (1). These features support the diagnosis of SCC.Relation with asbestos exposureAsbestos exposure is related to an increased risk of development of asbestosis (interstitial pulmonary fibrosis) and pleural diseases such as pleural plaques, pleural thickening and malignant mesothelioma. The pathogenesis and molecular basis of these diseases were reviewed recently (13) and the presence of asbestosis is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (14). The incidence of the various histological types of the lung cancers do not seem to be affected by the exposure to asbestos (15;16). Pulmonary malignancies of all histological types including small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) are found in patients with asbestos exposure (15;17). In a recent review of 500 cases of malignant mesothelioma synchronous malignancies were detected in 9 patients (1.8%) (18). From these 9 patients 6 had a pulmonary carcinoma (3 adenocarcinomas, 2 squamous cell carcinomas and one SCC) (18). Asbestos-induced pleural fibrosis is the most common radiographic finding among those exposed to asbestos (19). The two major known risk factors for bronchogenic carcinoma are smoking and asbestos exposure and these risk factors have a synergistic effect so that individuals who are exposed to asbestos and cigarette smoke have an approximate 30 to 50-fold increased risk of developing lung cancer (16). To our knowledge no new data has been published after publication of our case report describing other cases of a SCC of the pleura in a patients with asbestos related pleural disease. AbbreviationsCEA: carcino embyonic antigenSCC: small cell carcinomaSCLC: small cell lung carcinomaSIADH: syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion |