DIALISE PERITONEAL: EXPERIENCIA E CONHECIMENTO CUMULATIVOS MELHORAM OS RESULTADOS CLINICOS





DIALISE PERITONEAL: EXPERIENCIA E CONHECIMENTO CUMULATIVOS MELHORAM OS RESULTADOS CLINICOS

(especial para SIIC © Derechos reservados)
Mostramos que são seguidas orientações internacionais de pratica clínica com obtenção de resultados similares aos reportados por outros grupos europeus e americanos. O aumento crescente do programa deveu-se a um esforço colectivo e continuado da equipe de medicos e enfermeiros que juntos garantiram a orientação dos doentes com vigilancia dos resultados clinicos e optimização dos protocolos cirurgicos e terapeuticos.
Autor:
Anabela Rodrigues
Columnista Experto de SIIC

Institución:
Hospital Geral Santo Antonio


Artículos publicados por Anabela Rodrigues
Coautor
Anabela Rodrigues* 
MD, Hospital Geral Santo Antonio, Porto, Portugal*
Aprobación
18 de Abril, 2007
Primera edición
26 de Julio, 2007
Segunda edición, ampliada y corregida
7 de Junio, 2021

Artículo completo

(castellano)
Extensión:  +/-3.46 páginas impresas en papel A4
Exclusivo para suscriptores/assinantes

Clasificación en siicsalud
Artículos originales > Expertos de Iberoamérica >
página   www.siicsalud.com/des/expertocompleto.php/

Especialidades
Principal: Epidemiología, Nefrología y Medio Interno
Relacionadas: Administración Hospitalaria, Endocrinología y Metabolismo



Comprar este artículo
Extensión: 3.46 páginas impresas en papel A4

file05.gif (1491 bytes) Artículos seleccionados para su compra



Enviar correspondencia a:
AS Rodrigues, Hospital Geral Santo Antonio Department of Nephrology, 4000, Largo Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
Bibliografía del artículo
1. Blake PG. Integrated end-stage renal disease care: the role of peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16(Suppl 5):61-66, 2001.

2. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN, Collins AJ. The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 66:2389-2401, 2004.

3. Shih YC, Guo A, Just PM, Mujais S. Impact of initial dialysis modality and modality switches on Medicare expenditures of end-stage renal disease patients. Kidney Int 68:319-329, 2005.

4. Blake PG. Economics, focus on pre-dialysis may help stabilize peritoneal dialysis in Canada. Nephrol News Issues 16:56-58, 2002.

5. Mendelssohn DC, Mullaney SR, Jung B, Blake PG, Mehta RL. What do American nephologists think about dialysis modality selection? Am J Kidney Dis 37:22-29, 2001.

6. Gokal R, Blake PG, Passlick-Deetjen J, Schaub TP, Prichard S, Burkart JM. What is the evidence that peritoneal dialysis is underutilized as an ESRD therapy? Semin Dial 15:149-161, 2002.

7. Mendelssohn DC, Blake PG, Burkart J, Golper T, Oreopoulous D. Dialysis modality distribution in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 37:1330-1331, 2001.

8. Blake PG, Finkelstein FO. Why is the proportion of patients doing peritoneal dialysis declining in North America? Perit Dial Int 21:107-114, 2001.

9. Jung B, Blake PG, Mehta RL, Mendelssohn DC. Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection. Perit Dial Int 19:263-268, 1999.

10. Lameire N, Peeters P, Vanholder R, Van BW. Peritoneal dialysis in Europe: an analysis of its rise and fall. Blood Purif 24:107-114, 2006.

11. Ash SR. Chronic peritoneal dialysis catheters: procedures for placement, maintenance, and removal. Semin Nephrol 22:221-236, 2002.

12. Danielsson A, Blohme L, Tranaeus A, Hylander B. A prospective randomized study of the effect of a subcutaneously "buried" peritoneal dialysis catheter technique versus standard technique on the incidence of peritonitis and exit-site infection. Perit Dial Int 22:211-219, 2002.

13. Guo A, Mujais S. Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts. Kidney Int Suppl S3-12, 2003.

14. Gloor HJ. 20 years of peritoneal dialysis in a mid-sized Swiss hospital. Swiss Med Wkly 133:619-624, 2003.
15. Panagoutsos S, Kantartzi K, Passadakis P, Yannatos E, Mourvati E, Theodoridis M, Kriki P, Thodis E, Vargemezis V. Timely transfer of peritoneal dialysis patients to hemodialysis improves survival rates. Clin Nephrol 65:43-47, 2006.

16. Sancho A, Pérez Ruixo JJ, Gorriz JL, Miguel A, García RR, Avila A. Risk factors associated with survival in patients in a peritoneal dialysis program. Nefrologia 21:160-166, 2001.

17. D'Adamo G, Di Napoli A, Amoroso F, De Martino A, Della Grotta F, Filippini A, Mauro M, Rosa M, Santoboni A, Scaccia F, Di Lallo D, Miceli M, Spinelli C. Collaborative study on peritoneal dialysis (PD) as first dialysis treatment in an Italian region: 1994-2000. G Ital Nefrol 20:381-387, 2003.

18. Schaubel DE, Fenton SS. Trends in mortality on peritoneal dialysis: Canada, 1981-1997. J Am Soc Nephrol 11:126-133, 2000.

19. Schaubel DE, Morrison HI, Fenton SS. Comparing mortality rates on CAPD/CCPD and hemodialysis. The Canadian experience: fact or fiction? Perit Dial Int 18:478-484, 1998.

20. Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Van Manen JG, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT. The relative importance of residual renal function compared with peritoneal clearance for patient survival and quality of life: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD )-2. Am J Kidney Dis 41:1293-1302, 2003.

21. Trivedi H, Tan SH, Prowant B, Sherman A, Voinescu CG, Atalla J, Khanna R, Nolph K. Predictors of death in patients on peritoneal dialysis: the Missouri Peritoneal Dialysis Study. Am J Nephrol 25:466-473, 2005.

22. Merkus MP, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, de Haan RJ, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT: Predictors of poor outcome in chronic dialysis patients: The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis. The NECOSAD Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 35:69-79, 2000.

23. Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Van Manen JG, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2. J Am Soc Nephrol 14:2851-2860, 2003.

24. Stel VS, Van Dijk PCW, van Manen JG, Dekker FW, Ansell D, Conte F, Kramar R, Leivestad T, Vela E, Briggs JD, Jager KJ. Prevalence of co-morbidity in different European RRT populations and its effect on access to renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20:2803-2811, 2005.

25. Rodrigues AS, Almeida M, Fonseca I, Martins M, Carvalho MJ, Silva F, Correia C, Santos MJ, Cabrita A. Peritoneal fast transport in incident peritoneal dialysis patients is not consistently associated with systemic inflammation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21(3):763-9, 2005.

26. Rumpsfeld M, McDonald SP, Johnson DW. Higher peritoneal transport status is associated with higher mortality and technique failure in the Australian and New Zealand Peritoneal Dialysis Patient Populations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005.

27. Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M, Morrison HI, Mao Y, Copleston P, Jeffery JR, Kjellstrand CM. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis 30:334-342, 1997.

28. Vonesh EF, Moran J. Mortality in end-stage renal disease: a reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:354-365, 1999.

29. Collins AJ, Hao W, Xia H, Ebben JP, Everson SE, Constantini EG, Ma JZ. Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 34:1065-1074, 1999.

30. Van BW, Vanholder RC, Veys N, Dhondt A, Lameire NH. An evaluation of an integrative care approach for end-stage renal disease patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 11:116-125, 2000.

31. Shih YC, Guo A, Just PM, Mujais S. Impact of initial dialysis modality and modality switches on Medicare expenditures of end-stage renal disease patients. Kidney Int 68:319-329, 2005.

32. Lameire N, Joffe P, Wiedemann M. Healthcare systems--an international review: an overview. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14(Suppl 6):3-9, 1999.

33. Lameire N, Peeters P, Vanholder R, Van BW. Peritoneal dialysis in Europe: an analysis of its rise and fall. Blood Purif 24:107-114, 2006.

34. Habach G, Bloembergen WE, Mauger EA, Wolfe RA, Port FK. Hospitalization among United States dialysis patients: hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 5:1940-1948, 1995.

35. La Greca G, Chiaramonte S, Brendolan A, Bragantini L, Dell'Aquila R, Milan M, Crepaldi C, Dissegna D, Rodighiero M, Ronco C. Practice pattern and treatment options for kidney patients in a single North Italian nephrology center. Semin Nephrol 21:346-355, 2001.

36. Piraino B, Bailie GR, Bernardini J, Boeschoten E, Gupta A, Holmes C, Kuijper EJ, Li PK, Lye WC, Mujais S, Paterson DL, Fontan MP, Ramos A, Schaefer F, Uttley L. Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2005 update. Perit Dial Int 25:107-131, 2005.

37. Van BW, Dequidt C, Vijt D, Vanholder R, Lameire N. Analysis of the reasons for transfers between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis and their effect on survivals. Adv Perit Dial 14:90-94, 1998.

38. Schaubel DE, Blake PG, Fenton SS. Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 60:1517-1524, 2001.

39. Manns BJ, Taub K, Vanderstraeten C, Jones H, Mills C, Visser M, McLaughlin K. The impact of education on chronic kidney disease patients' plans to initiate dialysis with self-care dialysis: a randomized trial. Kidney Int 68:1777-1783, 2005.

40. Lameire N, Van BW. The pattern of referral of patients with end-stage renal disease to the nephrologist--a European survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14(Suppl 6):16-23, 1999.

Título español
 Bibliografía
 Artículo completo
(exclusivo a suscriptores)
 Autoevaluación
  Tema principal en SIIC Data Bases
 Especialidades

  English title
  Abstract
  Key words
Full text
(exclusivo a suscriptores)


Autor 
Artículos
Correspondencia
Patrocinio y reconocimiento
Imprimir esta página
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Está expresamente prohibida la redistribución y la redifusión de todo o parte de los contenidos de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC) S.A. sin previo y expreso consentimiento de SIIC.
ua31618